Essay --

pack and DescartesWilliam James and Rene Descartes are some(prenominal) philosophers who created system actings on how to find the truth in life. James created the pragmatic regularity and Descartes used reason. I calculate that these two methods are somewhat mingled for several reasons. The first reason, is because Descartes used his method to find proof in himself and urged others to use it to find truth in themselves as well whereas William James used the pragmatic method to help find the truth in two sides of an argument. In James first essay, he tries to explain what reality is with a story about a camping trip he took with a few of his friends. The friends began to argue about whether a domain and a squirrel expend each other while going around a tree moreover do not see one another. pragmatism seems to be a little confusing at first. I had to read the argument about the squirrel and the human a couple of times to earn what the argument was about. I personally agre ed with the group who said the man did not go around the squirrel simply because physically, he did not pass the animal while going around the tree. When James explained what the pragmatic method was, I interpreted it as basically trying to find appropriateness in both arguments depending on how youre looking at it. Descartes method is ultimately about finding the truth within yourself. He says that in that location are two types of people that would not benefit from his method those who imagine they know more than they do and who lack the patience for such on the lookout work, and those who are modest enough to think that they are more confident of finding out the truth if they follow a teacher. Descartes also creates a three to four maxim moral code to guide his demeanour while he experiences his period... ...uire that vital good, if religion is true. I think that this is why I cant fully agree with Descartes philosophical system because Im not a religious person. The maj ority of the time, I need physical evidence to believe in something. I feignt really feed into the I think, therefore I am philosophy because I wouldnt want my religion/ my beliefs to be everything that I am. I do consider that humans have free leave alone and are more than able to find the truth in something, but only if they are looking for it and doing anything whatsoever that is required to get the impression you want, regardless of the methods used. It does not matter whether these methods are legal or illegal, light or foul, kind or cruel, truth or lies, democratic or dictatorial, good or evil we see this on an everyday priming in peoples actions which coincides with James statement the end justifies the heart.