Is the truth obscured by language? Essay

Truth is public, independent of anyones belief and eternal.1 Language tout ensembleows us to bring forth knowledge from one person to a nonher(prenominal) by recording our thoughts and feelings and communicating these to others. However, I think that our knowledge can be falled by our capacity to fall through row. Truths ar obscured and our reading of them is influenced by the language that they are discourseed in. A truth whitethorn be by design concealed or misrepresented. The context in which it is expressed provide also affect our arrangement of it.Our understanding of something whitethorn be obscured by the ambiguity of language. A invent could have a range of have in mindings. very much the context in which a news program is handlingd determines its meaning. We go for language other than and respond dissimilarly to the various uses of language, depending on the context in which it is expressed. But in some cases, because of ambiguity, it is possible to get co nfused. If I aver, Visiting relatives can be so boring it could mean two divergent things. I whitethorn be expressing that I do not enjoy dismission over to visit a relative, or that I get bored when relatives hap to visit me. Both interpretations are relevant to the same context and thus the fortuity of confusion arises from ambiguity. The truth, that is, how I really feel, is obscured when the disapprobation is interpreted in a different way.The use of language confidential informations to material bodyifications, which determines our attitude and behavior. I think that in the case of generalizations, often the words whitethorn not mean anything that it is our conventional reactions, which determine our answer towards that which is beingness generalized. As well as reflecting realness, language may also take it. Blondes are classified as being deadening. This has given rise to the widespread use of the phrase dumb blondes and innumerable dumb blonde jokes. The word s earn reality to the extent that whenever someone meets a blonde person, his/her initial reaction is that he/she will be dumb. Such stereotypes exist in most aspects of everyday life.They contri neverthelesse to our opinions and these conceptualize notions lead us to go assumptions, which may not necessarily be true. patronage this, we still cling to our notions and as a result, our understanding of the truth has been altered. This also happens when we get at inferences and sagaciousnesss. Whenever we come to a conclusion close something based on what we know, it may not be valid. Once we make our judgment and express it in words, we are constrained to think along those lines and reduce the chance of arriving to a new conclusion.When I say that knee bend hurt Jill, we think that Jack, a boy, has physically hit Jill or perchance has been the cause of emotional pain for Jill, a girl. But the only information presented in the statement is that Jack is a victuals being and did something that could cause Jill to suffer. Jack and Jill may both be labels, or Jack may have hurt his dog Jill. We cannot be sure of what the true facts are. Nevertheless, we mint more than the information presented in the statement. Therefore, I view that language can create and maintain reality and make us believe something even if there is no basis on the true facts. citizenry may designedly avoid relation the truth and employ language to do so. We say that children name fibs, accused persons and criminals tell lies, witnesses commit perjury, politicians mislead the state, and lawyers misrepresent the truth. These are all different ways of expressing that a person has said something that is not true. They may do so to persuade others of a certain point of view or win an argument, or simply to care a product or make a profit. Politicians, particularly, use words, not to assoil or reveal the truth tho often to conceal and deceive. Politicians are brain at using phrases that fall soothingly on the ear still are empty of meaning. These phrases have been so unremarkably used that they cease to mean something, but they still create the feeling of reassurance and the politicians survey in gaining the battalions trust.For this purpose, they may use long, hard to define and doubtful words. Politicians, with the help of the media, have even vitiate the meaning of certain words. For example, in the new-made refugee situation, through the articles in the newspapers and the statements of various politicians, the people have been led to believe that boat-people, refugees, asylum-seekers, embezzled immigrants all mean the same thing. The people assume that all refugees are boat-people, all boat-people are illegal immigrants, and that asylum-seekers have no rights.2 The word freedom content to be free from political oppression, but now it means freedom from wants and needs, huger, unemployment, illiteracy, sickness, and so on something secured by t he government. The politicians may also use vagueness in language. A statement wish My government will take knockout countermeasures is vague and does not really promise anything but it gives the effect that they will filter their best. Thus, I believe, that language can be used to deliberately conceal the truth.I think that the truth can be obscured by the language in which we express them. The extent to which it is obscured would depend on the context. Classifications would lead us to make assumptions, which may not be true. Our interpretations and the judgments we make from them would create a difference between what is the truth and what we understand from the expression of that truth. People may deliberately use language to obscure the truth. The language of politics is designed to conceal the facts. advertize misleads the consumer. The truth remains the same. It cannot be changed but it can be misrepresented. I believe that when communicating the truth through language, it is our understanding of the truth, which leads us to believe something that is not true, hence obscuring the true facts.Bibliography1. Philosophy An Introduction to The dodge of Wondering2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http//plato.stanford.edu/3. shipway of subtle An Introduction to Theory of Knowledge. Michael woodman4. Thinking About Thinking. Antony Flew5. Introductory Readings on Language. Wallace L. Anderson and Norman C. Stageberg6. The Story of Language. Merio Pei7. A puritanical Line in Bigotry Article Philip Adams8. The degeneracy of Language Article Leslie Snyder9. Perraults Durable romance Cinderella Female Role Model Propoganda class handout1 Ways of Knowing An Introduction to Theory of Knowledge. Michael Woodman2 A Nice Line in Bigotry Article Philip Adams