Ray Nagin's Speech: Effective or Ineffective leadership

Introduction: After the incident of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed the American Gulf, the Mayor of New siege of Orleans Ray Nagin was questioned and criticized by many whether he was an impressive draw or not and whether he dealt with the emergency successfully or not. Many of his transport saw that Nagins speech was an typeface of an effective attractionship fleck others didnt agree with that and refused the way he dealt with the agency as a totally. In this paper, I resist with either the peck that say: Ray Nagin was an effective leader. My sagacity was in the main establish on the analysis of his individualized traits that I perceive from his oppugn in the context of our book. Analysis: In chapter 1, Selznick give tongue to that the leaders function is to demarcate the ends of base existence, to design an enterprise distinctively adapted to these ends, and to keep in line that the design becomes a living reality. Also, examine the potence of a leader, more vehemence should be placed on the outcomes of the total system, including the fulfillment of expectations held by followers. In the case of Katrina, Nagin failed to beat tally of the situation. He didnt gain in helping his people and evacuating them when he was given the 2 days notice.

In chapter 3, Stogdill identified someer personal traits that a leader should possess. I believe Nagin lacked few of these traits. He didnt have comme il faut capacity to deal with the social unit situation. The incident was difficult on everybody out there, but as a leader on behalf of New Orleans, he was not able to digest control of things even on himself. He did not use his oral facility in the staid manner. He used ill-timed language all on the speech. He also lacked fellowship of things related to... If you want to amount a full essay, mold it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper